Can't seem to find an appropriate voice for myself on this GPS " experiment", so bear with me
Its a tough one for me to get my mind around.
The general public seems to think GPS ( of one form or another) is as necessary as a Cell Phone for activities of daily living. Put a GPS in your car and never need a map again! Have Onstar and NEVER be LOST! Carry a cell phone with you and you'll ALWAYS BE IN TOUCH!
That may work well for a LOT of people on some parts of this earth's crust, and to me it obviously works SO WELL for them that when they discover there are places where NEITHER GPS nor Cell are functional or trustworthy, it is a meltdown moment ... and I see this almost daily, year-round. Yes, I really do. Nothing so pitiful as an angry, embarrassed and frustrated doctor on call who is sneaking 10 miles away from home for a family picnic, who suddenly realizes " being on call" is impossible because he can't TAKE call. Or the 99 clients a day who have reservations 60 miles away but were directed to MY location because the mapping software bundled with their *($%)### aftermarket car system is WRONG.
I live near and work IN the White Mountain National Forest of New Hampshire. At my winter workplace, there are a very few spots where cellphones have ANY reception,and you can lose that marginal cell signal by moving a few inches or simply by turning around in place. Topography and tower location are the reasons. You can't send or receive a cellular signal if the towers in every direction are obstructed by MOUNTAINS!
GPS-- or any satellite uplink, has a similar constraint. The satellites have certain orbits, and your transmitter has to have a clear window to a tolerable +/- degree and minute above the horizon from the selected location to send or receive signal. Again, in the tough terrain of the WMNF, you can't send or receive signal through MOUNTAINS! Our sat signal for our internet connection at work has exactly a 1degree 8 minute clearance over the southwestern shoulder of Mt Washington. When Mother Nature parks a dumping storm in that location.... POOF! No signal! WAYYYYYYY!
So while I'm digesting all of that for where I live and work ( there are 24 miles in my commute to work and I have cell signal for just 8 miles of that total), I'm thinking about the hikers and mountain climbers who are drawn to the Presidential Range of the WMNF in all kinds of weather. Just in this month of February 08 we have had several dramatic SAR operations with a couple of fatalities and some VERY Close Calls. There are several survivors today who thank their Deity that NH Air National Guard Blackhawk helicopter crews treat local SAR as Federally Funded training time . Our tax dollars at work, at home. cough cough
but I digress.
I know this is Off Topic for a sled-dog forum, but we ARE discussing GPS here, too. If you are inclined to some ancillary reading before race time, there was an article in Sunday's Boston Globe. ... I found the part about the 2 Presi Traverse veterans from WV quite telling ( they fared pretty well by virtue of being prepared for conditions, but their GPS foundation as a safety net failed them for lack of signal in terrain and weather).
http://www.boston.com/news/local/ar...ues_at_a_price/So I'm rambling, and I may be very much mistaken ( and don't hesitate to tell me that I truly Do NOT know Jack____), but I'm quite positive that sections of both the Iditarod routes ( Northern and Southern) have similarly marginal terrain for sat/cell service. We've seen it , we've been bogged down by it, heck we've all got the t-shirts.
IF ITC is taking money in sponsorship from a GPS vendor for this "Experiment" , I think it should be evident and transparent to all.
Karen Ramsted, you posted at the Irod site your particular views as an experienced veteran Irod musher and I thank you for entering your position.
Breeze