by Moose » Wed Jun 04, 2008 10:49 am
You're right, Motor. The Iditarod is The Last Great Race and holds incredible attraction for so many folks. I don't think the ITC will ever have trouble filling the field. Dog sports are increasing in popularity and participation all the time, whether it be at internationally, nationally, or regionally competitive levels or simply someone like me who just loves to be out on the trail with furry friends. From the standpoints of safety and logistics, though, it does seem the field needs to be reduced. It's just going to be exceptionally hard to find a fair, all-encompassing, non-exclusionary system. Power to The Powers That Be.
Some musings as I sit here on the East Coast, dogs underfoot, rain falling on the roof: Most of the teams that head out on the trail don't expect to win. Heck, the goal for most teams is merely to reach Nome with happy, healthy dogs. Outside of the top competitors and the ambitious competitor hopefuls, isn't it really the allure, the history, the romance, of being out on the Iditarod trail with a team of awesome dogs that's the attraction? Someone, either here or on another list, suggested that entrepreneurial kennels might provide a service and earn a nice income by facilitating an Iditarod experience for smaller kennels with bigger ambitions or the rest of us romantics by organizing and hosting an Iditarod "non-race". I suspect there are many out here who would (and already do) suffer the hardships, revel in the history, and pay a hefty fee to take "B" or other teams up the trail.
And you know, if the Iditarod (who will turn teams away) and the Quest (with a much smaller field traditionally) could somehow work together, pool their resources, market themselves together but individually, there would be more room for serious competitors and hopeful finishers for years to come.
Change, any change, is tough but inevitable. Hopefully there are some thoughtful and creative folks putting their heads together who will come up with thoughtful and creative solutions to this dilemma.
Wag more, bark less.